Source Selection Criteria (Reference Example)
🏆 Gold Standard Reference Example: This document illustrates a fully completed, production-grade artifact adhering to the Tasleemat PMO Framework (
PMO-04.09). All company names, project references, and figures are realistic fictional simulations.
Apex Global Solutions
Apex Unified Cloud ERP & Supply Chain Modernization - PRJ-2026-ERP-01
SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA
| Date Prepared: 2026-03-15 | Project Manager: Faisal Al-Harbi, PMP | Prepared By: Faisal Al-Harbi, PMP (Senior Project Manager) |
|---|---|---|
1. Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Framework
Technical Capability and Understanding (Weight): Earned Value Analysis (EVA) confirms robust cost control for the active reporting period. The project exhibits a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 1.04 and a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 1.01, yielding a favorable cost variance of $48,000 USD against the baseline.
Vendor Experience and Past Performance (Weight): Earned Value Analysis (EVA) confirms robust cost control for the active reporting period. The project exhibits a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 1.04 and a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 1.01, yielding a favorable cost variance of $48,000 USD against the baseline.
Financial Commercial Pricing (Weight): Earned Value Analysis (EVA) confirms robust cost control for the active reporting period. The project exhibits a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 1.04 and a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 1.01, yielding a favorable cost variance of $48,000 USD against the baseline.
Management Approach and Compliance (Weight): Earned Value Analysis (EVA) confirms robust cost control for the active reporting period. The project exhibits a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 1.04 and a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 1.01, yielding a favorable cost variance of $48,000 USD against the baseline.
2. Candidate Scoring and Assessment Table
Vendor Candidate Name and Proposal Identifier: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Technical and Commercial Score Breakdown: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Total Weighted Score: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
3. Final Evaluation Summary and Recommendation
Comparative Analysis and Value Justification: Earned Value Analysis (EVA) confirms robust cost control for the active reporting period. The project exhibits a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 1.04 and a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 1.01, yielding a favorable cost variance of $48,000 USD against the baseline.
Contract Award Recommendation and Sign-off: Earned Value Analysis (EVA) confirms robust cost control for the active reporting period. The project exhibits a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 1.04 and a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 1.01, yielding a favorable cost variance of $48,000 USD against the baseline.
Sign-off and Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procurement Manager | Mansour Al-Shehri (Head of Strategic Sourcing) | [Electronically Signed] | 2026-03-18 |
| Technical Evaluation Lead | Alex Mercer (Lead Solution Architect) | [Electronically Signed] | 2026-03-18 |
| Tender Committee Chair | Approved - Tender Committee Chair Name | [Electronically Signed] | 2026-03-18 |
| --- |
Template: SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA | Ref: PMO-04.09.03
Generated on: 2026-03-15 10:00 UTC, by Tasleemat