Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index
tasleemat asset PMO-04.06.06 template --lang en
Deliverable Summary & Governance Boundaries
Lifecycle Phase Alignment
Phase 04: Planning
Sizing Tier Requirements
Validation Contract
This deliverable conforms to a strict companion Draft 2020-12 JSON Schema for automated structural and semantic validation.
tasleemat validate PMO-04.06.06 ./completed_data.json
Template Markdown (Bilingual)
<!-- LLM INSTRUCTIONS: Fill in the [ Add details... ] placeholders based on project context.
Context and Definition: A formal human-centered leadership diagnostic tool measuring team psychological safety, cognitive load distribution, and collaborative well-being to sustain high performance.
Section Instructions:
- Assessment Baseline: Provide comprehensive data for all fields.
- Psychological Safety Dimensions: Provide comprehensive data for all fields.
- Cognitive Load and Well-being: Provide comprehensive data for all fields.
-->
<h3 dir="ltr" align="right">{{Company_Name}}</h3>
<h2 dir="ltr" align="right">{{Project_Name}} - {{Project_ID}}</h2>
<h1 dir="ltr" align="center">TEAM PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND WELLBEING INDEX</h1>
| **Date Prepared:** {{Current_Date}} | **Project Manager:** {{Project_Manager_Name}} | **Prepared By:** {{Prepared_By}} |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
---
## Assessment Baseline
**Assessment Period and Cadence:**
[ Add details... ]
**Facilitator and Working Model:**
[ Add details... ]
**Team Response Participation Rate:**
[ Add details... ]
---
## Psychological Safety Dimensions
**Vulnerability and Open Inquiry Score:**
[ Add details... ]
**Constructive Dissent and Innovation Score:**
[ Add details... ]
**Blameless Culture and Mutual Support Score:**
[ Add details... ]
---
## Cognitive Load and Well-being
**Cognitive Load and Overtime Health:**
[ Add details... ]
**Focus Time and Meeting Load Ratio:**
[ Add details... ]
**Well-being Action and Working Agreement Update:**
[ Add details... ]
---
### Sign-off and Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
| :--- | :--- | :---: | :---: |
| **Team Lead / Scrum Master** | {{Scrum_Master_Name}} | _______________________ | [ .... - .... - .... ] |
| **Project Manager** | {{Project_Manager_Name}} | _______________________ | [ .... - .... - .... ] |
| **People & Culture Partner** | {{HR_Partner_Name}} | _______________________ | [ .... - .... - .... ] |
---
<div dir="ltr" align="right" style="margin-top: 20px; font-size: 12px; color: #7f8c8d;">
<span>Electronic Audit Trail: Hash SHA256: {{Audit_Trail_SHA256_Hash}}</span> <br>
<strong>Template:</strong> TEAM PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND WELLBEING INDEX | <strong>Ref:</strong> PMO-04.06.06 <br>
<i>Generated on: {{Current_Timestamp}}, by <a href="https://github.com/fakhruldeen/Tasleemat/" style="color: #7f8c8d;">Tasleemat</a></i>
</div>
User Guide & Practitioner Instructions
Tasleemat Forms Guide
Project Artifact: Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index
Document Reference: PMO-04.06.06
This document provides a comprehensive, professional reference to understand the purpose and effective usage of the Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index in alignment with the Tasleemat framework and PMI PMBOK standards.
1. What?
A formal Tasleemat-aligned project artifact known as the Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index. A formal human-centered leadership diagnostic tool measuring team psychological safety, cognitive load distribution, and collaborative well-being to sustain high performance.
2. Why?
Because without a structured team psychological safety and wellbeing index, strategic execution risks misalignment, lack of objective telemetry, and compromised governance.
3. When?
This artifact is prepared during project lifecycle activities and refreshed across iterative cycles.
4. Who?
Responsibilities: Prepared by the designated project lead and approved by accountable governance authorities.
Tailoring Tips
- Scale the depth of analysis to match organizational complexity, regulatory standards, and delivery cadence.
- Ensure all key cross-functional stakeholders are actively engaged throughout lifecycle reviews.
Alignment & Dependencies
1. Pre-requisites & Inputs (Upstream Dependencies)
- Mandatory:
- Enterprise Strategic Plan
- Optional / Contextual:
- Project Charter (PMO-03.01)
2. Downstream Dependents
- Mandatory:
- Project Governance and Performance Records
5. How?
Fill out each section carefully following the specific field guidance provided below:
Assessment Baseline
- Assessment Period and Cadence: The evaluation sprint, sprint cadence, and designated survey period for measuring team psychological safety and cognitive well-being.
- Facilitator and Working Model: The designated agile coach, scrum master, or people lead facilitating the assessment, and the team's working arrangement (Co-located, Hybrid, or Fully Remote).
- Team Response Participation Rate: The percentage of team members participating in the anonymous assessment to validate sample representation.
Psychological Safety Dimensions
- Vulnerability and Open Inquiry Score: Aggregated rating reflecting team members' comfort in asking questions, admitting mistakes, and seeking help without fear of penalty.
- Constructive Dissent and Innovation Score: Aggregated rating reflecting psychological comfort in challenging assumptions, proposing novel ideas, and offering dissenting views.
- Blameless Culture and Mutual Support Score: Aggregated rating reflecting perceived team trust, peer collaboration, and constructive root-cause problem solving.
Cognitive Load and Well-being
- Cognitive Load and Overtime Health: Quantitative assessment of sustained work pressure, cognitive context-switching frequency, and overtime hours worked.
- Focus Time and Meeting Load Ratio: Ratio of uninterrupted deep-work focus time compared to total hours spent in synchronous meetings and ceremonies.
- Well-being Action and Working Agreement Update: Agreed interventions, meeting hygiene rules, focus-block policies, or team charter amendments enacted to protect team vitality.
6. Reference Example
A fully completed, gold-standard reference example illustrating this artifact in practice is available:
📖 Completed Example: 04_06_06_Team_Psychological_Safety_and_Wellbeing_Index_Example.md
LLM Generation Prompt & Agent Instructions
TEAM PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND WELLBEING INDEX - LLM GENERATION GUIDE
System Prompt / Instructions: This document serves as the detailed instruction set for generating the
TEAM PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND WELLBEING INDEX. When asked to populate this form, use the guidance provided for each section below to accurately generate the required content. Referenceparameters.mdfor global project variables.Context & Definition: A formal human-centered leadership diagnostic tool measuring team psychological safety, cognitive load distribution, and collaborative well-being to sustain high performance.
Alignment: This team psychological safety and wellbeing index must be aligned with standard PMI PMBOK principles.
Assessment Baseline
Assessment Period and Cadence
Instruction: The evaluation sprint, sprint cadence, and designated survey period for measuring team psychological safety and cognitive well-being.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Facilitator and Working Model
Instruction: The designated agile coach, scrum master, or people lead facilitating the assessment, and the team's working arrangement (Co-located, Hybrid, or Fully Remote).
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Team Response Participation Rate
Instruction: The percentage of team members participating in the anonymous assessment to validate sample representation.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Psychological Safety Dimensions
Vulnerability and Open Inquiry Score
Instruction: Aggregated rating reflecting team members' comfort in asking questions, admitting mistakes, and seeking help without fear of penalty.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Constructive Dissent and Innovation Score
Instruction: Aggregated rating reflecting psychological comfort in challenging assumptions, proposing novel ideas, and offering dissenting views.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Blameless Culture and Mutual Support Score
Instruction: Aggregated rating reflecting perceived team trust, peer collaboration, and constructive root-cause problem solving.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Cognitive Load and Well-being
Cognitive Load and Overtime Health
Instruction: Quantitative assessment of sustained work pressure, cognitive context-switching frequency, and overtime hours worked.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Focus Time and Meeting Load Ratio
Instruction: Ratio of uninterrupted deep-work focus time compared to total hours spent in synchronous meetings and ceremonies.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Well-being Action and Working Agreement Update
Instruction: Agreed interventions, meeting hygiene rules, focus-block policies, or team charter amendments enacted to protect team vitality.
Generated value: [ Add details... ]
Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index (Reference Example)
🏆 Gold Standard Reference Example: This document illustrates a fully completed, production-grade artifact adhering to the Tasleemat PMO Framework (
PMO-04.06). All company names, project references, and figures are realistic fictional simulations.
Apex Global Solutions
Apex Unified Cloud ERP & Supply Chain Modernization - PRJ-2026-ERP-01
TEAM PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND WELLBEING INDEX
Assessment Baseline
Assessment Period and Cadence: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Facilitator and Working Model: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Team Response Participation Rate: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Psychological Safety Dimensions
Vulnerability and Open Inquiry Score: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Constructive Dissent and Innovation Score: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Blameless Culture and Mutual Support Score: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Cognitive Load and Well-being
Cognitive Load and Overtime Health: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Focus Time and Meeting Load Ratio: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Well-being Action and Working Agreement Update: This section has been thoroughly documented and validated in accordance with Apex Global Solutions operational baseline and PMO delivery governance standards.
Sign-off and Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team Lead / Scrum Master | Hassan Al-Majid, CSM | [Electronically Signed] | 2026-03-18 |
| Project Manager | Faisal Al-Harbi, PMP | [Electronically Signed] | 2026-03-18 |
| People & Culture Partner | Sami Al-Ghamdi (HR Business Partner) | [Electronically Signed] | 2026-03-18 |
| --- |
Generated on: 2026-03-15 10:00 UTC, by Tasleemat
Draft 2020-12 JSON Schema
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$id": "https://tasleemat.pmo/schemas/completed/PMO-04.06.06.schema.json",
"title": "Completed Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index Data Contract",
"description": "Additive structural schema validating completed Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index artifact data payloads (PMO-04.06.06).",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"artifact_id": {
"type": "string",
"const": "PMO-04.06.06"
},
"metadata": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"project_name": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"project_code": {
"type": "string"
},
"date_prepared": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date"
},
"project_manager": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"prepared_by": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"version": {
"type": "string"
},
"status": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"draft",
"baselined",
"in_review",
"approved"
]
}
},
"required": [
"project_name",
"date_prepared",
"project_manager",
"prepared_by"
]
},
"assessment_baseline": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"assessment_period_and_cadence": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "The evaluation sprint, sprint cadence, and designated survey period for measuring team psychological safety and cognitive well-being."
},
"facilitator_and_working_model": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "The designated agile coach, scrum master, or people lead facilitating the assessment, and the team's working arrangement (Co-located, Hybrid, or Fully Remote)."
},
"team_response_participation_rate": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "The percentage of team members participating in the anonymous assessment to validate sample representation."
}
},
"required": [
"assessment_period_and_cadence",
"facilitator_and_working_model",
"team_response_participation_rate"
]
},
"psychological_safety_dimensions": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"vulnerability_and_open_inquiry_score": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "Aggregated rating reflecting team members' comfort in asking questions, admitting mistakes, and seeking help without fear of penalty."
},
"constructive_dissent_and_innovation_score": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "Aggregated rating reflecting psychological comfort in challenging assumptions, proposing novel ideas, and offering dissenting views."
},
"blameless_culture_and_mutual_support_score": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "Aggregated rating reflecting perceived team trust, peer collaboration, and constructive root-cause problem solving."
}
},
"required": [
"vulnerability_and_open_inquiry_score",
"constructive_dissent_and_innovation_score",
"blameless_culture_and_mutual_support_score"
]
},
"cognitive_load_and_well_being": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"cognitive_load_and_overtime_health": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "Quantitative assessment of sustained work pressure, cognitive context-switching frequency, and overtime hours worked."
},
"focus_time_and_meeting_load_ratio": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "Ratio of uninterrupted deep-work focus time compared to total hours spent in synchronous meetings and ceremonies."
},
"well_being_action_and_working_agreement_update": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"description": "Agreed interventions, meeting hygiene rules, focus-block policies, or team charter amendments enacted to protect team vitality."
}
},
"required": [
"cognitive_load_and_overtime_health",
"focus_time_and_meeting_load_ratio",
"well_being_action_and_working_agreement_update"
]
}
},
"required": [
"artifact_id",
"metadata",
"assessment_baseline",
"psychological_safety_dimensions",
"cognitive_load_and_well_being"
]
}
📋 Form Field Definitions Dictionary (Legacy Specification)
{
"_llm_instructions": "Fill in the 'project_title' and 'date_prepared' properties, and the 'value' property of each field, based on the provided project context. Reference parameters.md for global project variables.",
"form_name": "Team Psychological Safety and Wellbeing Index",
"document_reference": "PMO-04.06.06",
"project_title": "",
"date_prepared": "",
"fields": {
"f01_Assessment_Period_and_Cadence": {
"section": "Assessment Baseline",
"label": "Assessment Period and Cadence",
"guidance": "The evaluation sprint, sprint cadence, and designated survey period for measuring team psychological safety and cognitive well-being.",
"value": ""
},
"f02_Facilitator_and_Working_Model": {
"section": "Assessment Baseline",
"label": "Facilitator and Working Model",
"guidance": "The designated agile coach, scrum master, or people lead facilitating the assessment, and the team's working arrangement (Co-located, Hybrid, or Fully Remote).",
"value": ""
},
"f03_Team_Response_Participation_Rate": {
"section": "Assessment Baseline",
"label": "Team Response Participation Rate",
"guidance": "The percentage of team members participating in the anonymous assessment to validate sample representation.",
"value": ""
},
"f04_Vulnerability_and_Open_Inquiry_Score": {
"section": "Psychological Safety Dimensions",
"label": "Vulnerability and Open Inquiry Score",
"guidance": "Aggregated rating reflecting team members' comfort in asking questions, admitting mistakes, and seeking help without fear of penalty.",
"value": ""
},
"f05_Constructive_Dissent_and_Innovation_Score": {
"section": "Psychological Safety Dimensions",
"label": "Constructive Dissent and Innovation Score",
"guidance": "Aggregated rating reflecting psychological comfort in challenging assumptions, proposing novel ideas, and offering dissenting views.",
"value": ""
},
"f06_Blameless_Culture_and_Mutual_Support_Score": {
"section": "Psychological Safety Dimensions",
"label": "Blameless Culture and Mutual Support Score",
"guidance": "Aggregated rating reflecting perceived team trust, peer collaboration, and constructive root-cause problem solving.",
"value": ""
},
"f07_Cognitive_Load_and_Overtime_Health": {
"section": "Cognitive Load and Well-being",
"label": "Cognitive Load and Overtime Health",
"guidance": "Quantitative assessment of sustained work pressure, cognitive context-switching frequency, and overtime hours worked.",
"value": ""
},
"f08_Focus_Time_and_Meeting_Load_Ratio": {
"section": "Cognitive Load and Well-being",
"label": "Focus Time and Meeting Load Ratio",
"guidance": "Ratio of uninterrupted deep-work focus time compared to total hours spent in synchronous meetings and ceremonies.",
"value": ""
},
"f09_Well_being_Action_and_Working_Agreement_Update": {
"section": "Cognitive Load and Well-being",
"label": "Well-being Action and Working Agreement Update",
"guidance": "Agreed interventions, meeting hygiene rules, focus-block policies, or team charter amendments enacted to protect team vitality.",
"value": ""
}
}
}