<!-- تعليمات للنموذج الذكي: قم بتعبئة العناصر النائبة [ أضف التفاصيل... ] بناءً على سياق المشروع.

تعليمات الأقسام بالتفصيل:
- أوزان ومعايير التقييم الفني والمالي: قدّم بيانات شاملة ودقيقة لكافة الحقول المطلوبة في هذا القسم.
- جدول تقييم ودرجات المرشحين: قدّم بيانات شاملة ودقيقة لكافة الحقول المطلوبة في هذا القسم.
- الخلاصة والتوصية بالترسية: قدّم بيانات شاملة ودقيقة لكافة الحقول المطلوبة في هذا القسم.
-->


<h3 align="left">{{اسم_الشركة}}</h3>
<h2 align="left">{{اسم_المشروع}} - {{معرف_المشروع}}</h2>
<h1 align="center">معايير اختيار المصدر</h1>

| **تاريخ الإعداد:** {{التاريخ_الحالي}} | **مدير المشروع:** {{اسم_مدير_المشروع}} | **تم الإعداد بواسطة:** {{تم_الإعداد_بواسطة}} |
| ---: | ---: | ---: |

---

## 1. أوزان ومعايير التقييم الفني والمالي

**القدرة الفنية وفهم العمل (الوزن النسبي):**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

**الخبرة السابقة وأداء المورد (الوزن النسبي):**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

**التسعير التجاري والمالي (الوزن النسبي):**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

**المنهجية الإدارية والامتثال (الوزن النسبي):**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

---

## 2. جدول تقييم ودرجات المرشحين

**اسم المورد المرشح ومعرف العرض:**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

**تفاصيل الدرجات الفنية والمالية:**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

**إجمالي الدرجة الموزونة:**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

---

## 3. الخلاصة والتوصية بالترسية

**التحليل المقارن ومبررات القيمة:**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

**توصية لجنة التقييم بالترسية والاعتماد:**
[ أضف التفاصيل... ]

---

### الاعتماد والموافقات

| الدور | الاسم | التوقيع | التاريخ |
| ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| **مدير المشتريات** | {{اسم_مدير_المشتريات}} | _______________________ | [.... -.... -.... ] |
| **مسؤول التقييم الفني** | {{اسم_مسؤول_التقييم_الفني}} | _______________________ | [.... -.... -.... ] |
| **رئيس لجنة العطاءات والمشتريات** | {{اسم_رئيس_لجنة_العطاءات}} | _______________________ | [.... -.... -.... ] |
---

<div align="left" style="margin-top: 20px; font-size: 12px; color: #7f8c8d;">
  <span>سجل التدقيق الإلكتروني: Hash SHA256: {{رمز_تجزئة_التدقيق_SHA256}}</span> <br>
 <strong>القالب:</strong> معايير اختيار المصدر | <strong>المرجع:</strong> PMO-04.09.03 <br>
 <i>تم التوليد في: {{الطابع_الزمني_الحالي}}، بواسطة <a href="https://github.com/fakhruldeen/Tasleemat/" style="color: #7f8c8d;">تسليمات</a></i>
</div>

</div>

{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "$id": "https://tasleemat.pmo/schemas/completed/PMO-04.09.03.schema.json",
  "title": "Completed SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA Data Contract",
  "description": "Additive structural schema validating completed SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA artifact data payloads (PMO-04.09.03).",
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "artifact_id": {
      "type": "string",
      "const": "PMO-04.09.03"
    },
    "metadata": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "project_name": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1
        },
        "project_code": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "date_prepared": {
          "type": "string",
          "format": "date"
        },
        "project_manager": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1
        },
        "prepared_by": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1
        },
        "version": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "status": {
          "type": "string",
          "enum": [
            "draft",
            "baselined",
            "in_review",
            "approved"
          ]
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "project_name",
        "date_prepared",
        "project_manager",
        "prepared_by"
      ]
    },
    "evaluation_criteria_and_weighting_framework": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "technical_capability_and_understanding_weight": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Scoring weight and criteria assessing technical approach, compliance with SOW, and architecture."
        },
        "vendor_experience_and_past_performance_weight": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Scoring weight and criteria evaluating track record, references, and relevant past project delivery."
        },
        "financial_commercial_pricing_weight": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Scoring weight and evaluation model for pricing, total cost of ownership (TCO), and rate competitiveness."
        },
        "management_approach_and_compliance_weight": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Scoring weight evaluating project management methodology, staffing qualifications, and contractual compliance."
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "technical_capability_and_understanding_weight",
        "vendor_experience_and_past_performance_weight",
        "financial_commercial_pricing_weight",
        "management_approach_and_compliance_weight"
      ]
    },
    "candidate_scoring_and_assessment_table": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "vendor_candidate_name_and_proposal_identifier": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Identification of bidding vendor, proposal reference number, and submission date."
        },
        "technical_and_commercial_score_breakdown": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Individual numerical scores assigned across technical, commercial, and past performance criteria."
        },
        "total_weighted_score": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Consolidated total weighted evaluation score out of 100 points for each candidate."
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "vendor_candidate_name_and_proposal_identifier",
        "technical_and_commercial_score_breakdown",
        "total_weighted_score"
      ]
    },
    "final_evaluation_summary_and_recommendation": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "comparative_analysis_and_value_justification": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Narrative justifying why the winning proposal offers superior value, quality, or pricing."
        },
        "contract_award_recommendation_and_sign_off": {
          "type": "string",
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Formal evaluation committee recommendation identifying preferred vendor for contract execution."
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "comparative_analysis_and_value_justification",
        "contract_award_recommendation_and_sign_off"
      ]
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "artifact_id",
    "metadata",
    "evaluation_criteria_and_weighting_framework",
    "candidate_scoring_and_assessment_table",
    "final_evaluation_summary_and_recommendation"
  ]
}

{
  "form_name": "SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA",
  "document_reference": "PMO-04.09.03",
  "_llm_instructions": "Populate the fields of 'SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA' and write the value of each field under 'Generated Value', based on the project context. Context: the project carrying reference PMO-04.09.03.",
  "project_title": "",
  "date_prepared": "",
  "fields": {
    "f01_Technical_Capability_and_Understanding_Weight": {
      "section": "Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Framework",
      "label": "Technical Capability and Understanding (Weight)",
      "guidance": "Scoring weight and criteria assessing technical approach, compliance with SOW, and architecture.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f02_Vendor_Experience_and_Past_Performance_Weight": {
      "section": "Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Framework",
      "label": "Vendor Experience and Past Performance (Weight)",
      "guidance": "Scoring weight and criteria evaluating track record, references, and relevant past project delivery.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f03_Financial_Commercial_Pricing_Weight": {
      "section": "Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Framework",
      "label": "Financial Commercial Pricing (Weight)",
      "guidance": "Scoring weight and evaluation model for pricing, total cost of ownership (TCO), and rate competitiveness.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f04_Management_Approach_and_Compliance_Weight": {
      "section": "Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Framework",
      "label": "Management Approach and Compliance (Weight)",
      "guidance": "Scoring weight evaluating project management methodology, staffing qualifications, and contractual compliance.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f05_Vendor_Candidate_Name_and_Proposal_Identifier": {
      "section": "Candidate Scoring and Assessment Table",
      "label": "Vendor Candidate Name and Proposal Identifier",
      "guidance": "Identification of bidding vendor, proposal reference number, and submission date.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f06_Technical_and_Commercial_Score_Breakdown": {
      "section": "Candidate Scoring and Assessment Table",
      "label": "Technical and Commercial Score Breakdown",
      "guidance": "Individual numerical scores assigned across technical, commercial, and past performance criteria.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f07_Total_Weighted_Score": {
      "section": "Candidate Scoring and Assessment Table",
      "label": "Total Weighted Score",
      "guidance": "Consolidated total weighted evaluation score out of 100 points for each candidate.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f08_Comparative_Analysis_and_Value_Justification": {
      "section": "Final Evaluation Summary and Recommendation",
      "label": "Comparative Analysis and Value Justification",
      "guidance": "Narrative justifying why the winning proposal offers superior value, quality, or pricing.",
      "value": ""
    },
    "f09_Contract_Award_Recommendation_and_Sign_off": {
      "section": "Final Evaluation Summary and Recommendation",
      "label": "Contract Award Recommendation and Sign-off",
      "guidance": "Formal evaluation committee recommendation identifying preferred vendor for contract execution.",
      "value": ""
    }
  }
}